.
Feedback

Edmonds Councilmember: Taxpayers Shouldn't Subsidize Town of Woodway

Adrienne Fraley-Monillas: "The City of Edmonds and Edmonds City Council didn’t complete due diligence prior to voting for this contract."

I have read a couple of letters to the editor in the local papers from the Town of Woodways council explaining why I and other Edmonds City Council votes were wrong against the multiple-year police contract agreed to with Woodway.

(Read a letter to the editor from Woodway Mayor Carla Nichols.)

I thought maybe the Edmonds taxpayers deserved the full explanation.

Woodway councilmember Mitchell maintained the three of us that voted against it “failed to comprehend” the contract. Oh trust me, the three of us clearly understood the taxpayers of Edmonds were subsidizing the Town of Woodway.

This contract agreed to was for $36,000 per YEAR for 16 hours per day, 365 days per year of emergency services. Woodway currently has an average of eight hours a day of a contracted officer who is employed by the town of Woodway. The City of Edmonds Police Department budget is about $9.5 million per year.

Woodway Council indicated they did not request full service contacts with our police force and only wanted limited backup services, although we are the only police agency to routinely serve 16 hours per day of emergency services to Woodway.

Edmonds Police Chief (Al Compaan) offered serving Woodway full time and, charging as such, he was turned down by the mayor of Woodway. Woodway indicated that they didn’t request Edmonds Police Department speed control, investigations or patrolling the streets of Woodway.

They only wanted a response from Edmonds Police, the responding agency when 911 is called 16 hours per day.

Those 10 or more calls per month the Edmonds Police Department respond to in Woodway take away from the duties the Edmonds police officers should/could be providing the tax payers of Edmonds.

The city of Edmonds taxpayers are providing average of 16 HOURS per day of emergency services from the Edmonds Police Department for $36,000 per year to Woodway.

City of Woodway also has (Snohomish County) Fire District 1, who provides emergency fire and paramedic services to Woodway for over $500,000 per year. They have less than 25 calls per year to Fire District 1.

That averages to $20,000 per call Woodway pays Fire District 1. With the new police contract with Edmonds, it averages $300 per call for police for over 120 calls per year. Edmonds taxpayers can’t base what they end up paying by number of emergency police calls they make. We also must pay for clerical supports, dive teams, training, supplies, uniforms and so forth.

The Edmonds Police force is hard-working, with dedicated men and women. Their salaries, benefits and contracts are based on cities similar in population, not number of calls or types of calls as Woodway would suggest.

If you divide our population by $9.5 million per year and do the same with the city of Woodway’s population, you get your suggested real cost of $360,000 dollars per year. Minus the eight hours per day of Woodway police force currently has, equals about $240,000 per year they should be paying to pay their fair share of our costs.

The City of Edmonds and Edmonds City Council didn’t complete due diligence prior to voting for this contract. They voted without information. We saw no other city comparables for like situations nor were we informed what the surrounding police departments would charge the Town of Woodway for the same services.  I represent the citizens of the City of Edmonds, not the Town of Woodway.

As taxpayers, when you pay for police and fire services, you are paying for insurance you hope you never have to use. 

Adrienne Fraley-Monillas
Edmonds City Council

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Edmonds Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Kim Carney May 21, 2013 at 03:57 pm
It is beautiful and cold, just like Edmonds ;)
mojomichelle May 18, 2013 at 09:03 am
That is true about Citypark being in a lot of shade. Where's the skateboard park? Possibly a spotRead More at Edmonds Marina Beach??
Jeanne Gustafson (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 02:00 pm
Cassy said on Facebook (sorry to those having trouble logging in today!): Would love to have aRead More splash pad and yes please move it so it is in the full sun. If you are going to have a splash pad we need to take advantage of the sunshine.
James Spangler May 17, 2013 at 01:46 pm
A splash pad would be great, but that space is so shady - maybe next to the skateboard park instead.Read More
CMR May 18, 2013 at 03:20 pm
Works well for me. I like the new format
Priya Sinha May 15, 2013 at 02:37 pm
It sucks! Its confusing to follow.
Terri Buysse March 29, 2013 at 09:35 pm
If you want to know what it's like to have your religion disrespected, try having school camps,Read More orchestra and band concerts and back-to-school nights on the holiest of your religious holidays (equivalent to Christmas and Easter). Everyone knows that an egg hunt is an Easter event whether it's called that or not. Everyone know that a holiday tree is really a Christmas tree. Trust me, the atheists and/or non-Christians are not trying to destroy Christianity. First, it would be impossible. Second, it would be too dangerous to us personally. Last, I personally respect other's traditions, but I'm not sure the same can always be said in reverse.
KGreen March 29, 2013 at 02:44 pm
Don't we have more important things to worry about? Easter Egg, Egg Hunt, who cares? It's a funRead More community event. And thank you to the sponsers that make this happen.
Sally Hyde March 28, 2013 at 10:24 pm
First of all, the government is not supposed to promote any religion. Secondly, the Easter bunnyRead More and egg hunt has no historical religious significance that I can think of, even though this is part of an American tradition. I am good with deleting the word Easter, and would like to see a departure from any emphasis on candy, which only compounds the diabetic epidemic in this country. Sometimes it is good to rethink the wisdom of something simply because it is a "tradition".