.
Feedback

Are Young Girls Dressing Too Provocatively?

Patch takes a look at the media's role in sexualizing girls at an early age, and wonders where to pin the blame.

explored the idea that young girls may be dressing too provocatively for their age. It’s not a new subject; since Barbie came on the scene in 1959, parents have been concerned that the doll established an unrealistic idea of body image for young girls. Fast-forward a couple of decades and you have controversies surrounding Madonna, then Brittney Spears and now Katy Perry. Children are bombarded with images of women dressing and acting sexy in everything from Victoria’s Secret ads to Sesame Street.

The Huffington Post last month tackled the subject of how to raise girls with a positive image of women’s bodies and sexuality when the young celebrities marketed to them "evolve" from portraying themselves as sweet 16s to seductresses. In her book "Cinderella Ate My Daughter: Dispatches From the Front Lines of the New Girlie-Girl Culture," Peggy Orenstein discusses the idea that urging girls to be pretty in pink may indoctrinate them into the idea that they have to be attractive to be happy.

Diane Taylor posed it this way in Mercer Island Patch:

“When you enter an Abercrombie & Fitch store you are bombarded with bigger-than-life photos of bare-chested young men and scantily clad young women, often together and touching in the same poster. It seems that the low-cut, the tight and the short have hit extremes and are the 'IT' of teen fashion. A perfect petri dish in which to observe this trend is at   where many skirts barely cover the derriere, and strapless is the norm. But that is high school.

"It is not unusual for such trends to trickle down to the middle school-aged kids, who are starting to shop at trendier stores and view more cable television where the shocking is what sells, whether it's fashion, language or 'reality' conduct. There is a dress code at the public middle school on Mercer Island, but enforcement in this area might require one more FTE (full-time employee). The girls, who are ahead of the boys in this arena, drive this train. Boys are still wearing (and will continue for quite some time) T-shirts, basketball shorts, no-see-um socks and on, high-fashion days, jeans.

"Some concerned parents think the sexually suggestive has trickled down dangerously far, even to elementary-aged kids. Are kids at this age more aware of boy-girl relationships than ever before? Are they wearing suggestive outfits? Do you think it's due to media coverage like MTV? Reality shows? Even Hannah Montana on the Disney Channel seems to expose younger kids to sexuality.”

What do you think? Are you girls dressing too proactively for their age? Are images in the media imposing the idea of sexuality on them at too early an age? Are parents to blame for letting their daughters emulate their celebrity idols by wearing clothing that is not age-appropriate? And what about boys? Are they being conditioned by the media to view women as just sexual objects?

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Edmonds Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Kim Carney May 21, 2013 at 03:57 pm
It is beautiful and cold, just like Edmonds ;)
mojomichelle May 18, 2013 at 09:03 am
That is true about Citypark being in a lot of shade. Where's the skateboard park? Possibly a spotRead More at Edmonds Marina Beach??
Jeanne Gustafson (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 02:00 pm
Cassy said on Facebook (sorry to those having trouble logging in today!): Would love to have aRead More splash pad and yes please move it so it is in the full sun. If you are going to have a splash pad we need to take advantage of the sunshine.
James Spangler May 17, 2013 at 01:46 pm
A splash pad would be great, but that space is so shady - maybe next to the skateboard park instead.Read More
CMR May 18, 2013 at 03:20 pm
Works well for me. I like the new format
Priya Sinha May 15, 2013 at 02:37 pm
It sucks! Its confusing to follow.
Terri Buysse March 29, 2013 at 09:35 pm
If you want to know what it's like to have your religion disrespected, try having school camps,Read More orchestra and band concerts and back-to-school nights on the holiest of your religious holidays (equivalent to Christmas and Easter). Everyone knows that an egg hunt is an Easter event whether it's called that or not. Everyone know that a holiday tree is really a Christmas tree. Trust me, the atheists and/or non-Christians are not trying to destroy Christianity. First, it would be impossible. Second, it would be too dangerous to us personally. Last, I personally respect other's traditions, but I'm not sure the same can always be said in reverse.
KGreen March 29, 2013 at 02:44 pm
Don't we have more important things to worry about? Easter Egg, Egg Hunt, who cares? It's a funRead More community event. And thank you to the sponsers that make this happen.
Sally Hyde March 28, 2013 at 10:24 pm
First of all, the government is not supposed to promote any religion. Secondly, the Easter bunnyRead More and egg hunt has no historical religious significance that I can think of, even though this is part of an American tradition. I am good with deleting the word Easter, and would like to see a departure from any emphasis on candy, which only compounds the diabetic epidemic in this country. Sometimes it is good to rethink the wisdom of something simply because it is a "tradition".