.
Feedback

The First-Time Homebuyer Credit May Need to be Repaid

A local agent explains how some home buyers may have to pay up.

The financial credits given to first-time homebuyers (FTHC) in 2008-2010 rapidly boosted home sales in our area and nationwide during the early years of the economic recession. 

The credit for homes purchased in 2008 provided up to $7,500 as an interest-free loan to be repaid in equal annual installments for 15 years.  The subsequent tax credits of 2009 and 2010 raised that amount to a maximum of $8,000 that did not have to be repaid under most circumstances.  Those circumstances, when triggered, can require full repayment of the credit, partial repayment, or none at all.  The Internal Revenue Service has guidance on circumstances that may trigger repayment of the FTHC received.

For homes purchased in 2008, repayment is required in all cases in the form of an interest-free loan over a 15 year period.  However, there are a few circumstances that can accelerate that loan repayment requirement:

  • The homeowner sells her home or converts the home to a rental prior to full repayment of the tax credit received.  A. Full repayment of the tax credit is due, less any amounts that have been repaid.
  • The owner has converted the home to a business and no longer resides in it as a primary residence.  A. Full repayment of the tax credit is due in the year the home is converted to a business, less any amounts that have been repaid.
  • A single person bought the home and dies before full repayment.  A. The entire amount that has not been repaid is forgiven.
  • A couple bought the home in 2008 and one of them dies prior to full repayment.  A. One-half of the remaining amount due is forgiven and the surviving owner must repay their half remaining due at a rate of $250 per year.
  • A couple bought their home in 2008 and they divorce before full repayment.  Taxpayer A retains the home and taxpayer B no longer has legal right to the home.  A. Taxpayer B is no longer responsible for the remaining credit due and taxpayer A must repay the entire balance due over the remaining life of the loan.

For homes purchased under the FTHC in 2009 and 2010 the repayment triggers are less extensive:

  • An owner converts their home to a rental or business prior to residing in it for 36 months as a primary residence. A. The entire amount must be repaid in the year of conversion.
  • An owner sells their home prior to residing in it for 36 months as a primary residence. A. The entire amount of the credit must be repaid if there is a gain on the sale of the home.
  • A single homeowner dies prior to owning the home 36 months. A. No repayment is required.
  • Two homeowners purchase the home and owner A dies prior to 36 months.  Owner B is not required to repay the FTHC as long as they remain in the home for at least 36 months.

 Obviously, these scenarios don’t cover every circumstance, but it’s important to remember that the gift of a major incentive, whether a full credit or an interest-free loan from the government, did come with some restrictions.  The boost that came from sales during those FTHC years was worth a little restriction on the money received.  Further information can be found at www.IRS.gov.  Be sure to check with your CPA for clarification on how the repayment triggers may affect you.

 

Cheri Neil and Tom Crowe are a sister-brother Real Estate Team at Windermere GH LLC in Edmonds.  With over 17 years of combined experience, they special in residential real estate in southeast Snohomish County and Northwest King County.  Cheri is a licensed CPA (no longer practicing) but interested in all things related to Real Estate. They can be reached at cheri@cheriandtom.com



Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Edmonds Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
mojomichelle May 18, 2013 at 09:03 am
That is true about Citypark being in a lot of shade. Where's the skateboard park? Possibly a spotRead More at Edmonds Marina Beach??
Jeanne Gustafson (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 02:00 pm
Cassy said on Facebook (sorry to those having trouble logging in today!): Would love to have aRead More splash pad and yes please move it so it is in the full sun. If you are going to have a splash pad we need to take advantage of the sunshine.
James Spangler May 17, 2013 at 01:46 pm
A splash pad would be great, but that space is so shady - maybe next to the skateboard park instead.Read More
Terri Buysse March 29, 2013 at 09:35 pm
If you want to know what it's like to have your religion disrespected, try having school camps,Read More orchestra and band concerts and back-to-school nights on the holiest of your religious holidays (equivalent to Christmas and Easter). Everyone knows that an egg hunt is an Easter event whether it's called that or not. Everyone know that a holiday tree is really a Christmas tree. Trust me, the atheists and/or non-Christians are not trying to destroy Christianity. First, it would be impossible. Second, it would be too dangerous to us personally. Last, I personally respect other's traditions, but I'm not sure the same can always be said in reverse.
KGreen March 29, 2013 at 02:44 pm
Don't we have more important things to worry about? Easter Egg, Egg Hunt, who cares? It's a funRead More community event. And thank you to the sponsers that make this happen.
Sally Hyde March 28, 2013 at 10:24 pm
First of all, the government is not supposed to promote any religion. Secondly, the Easter bunnyRead More and egg hunt has no historical religious significance that I can think of, even though this is part of an American tradition. I am good with deleting the word Easter, and would like to see a departure from any emphasis on candy, which only compounds the diabetic epidemic in this country. Sometimes it is good to rethink the wisdom of something simply because it is a "tradition".